The Timpson Lyceum seal

The Timpson Lyceum · Linear Algebra (2026)

1.7 Exercises

Problems with worked solutions · 20 points · 4 extra credit

Linear Independence

  1. 1. (2 pts) Determine whether the columns of [1235]\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 3 & 5 \end{bmatrix} are linearly independent.

    Solution

    1. Neither column is a scalar multiple of the other: (2,5)=k(1,3)(2,5) = k(1,3) would force k=2k = 2 from the first entry yet k=53k = \tfrac{5}{3} from the second, which is impossible. By the two-vector criterion the columns are linearly independent. (Equivalently, row reduce [1235]→R2−3R1[120−1]\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 3 & 5 \end{bmatrix} \xrightarrow{R_2 - 3R_1} \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix}: a pivot in every column, so c1a1+c2a2=0c_1\mathbf{a}_1 + c_2\mathbf{a}_2 = \mathbf{0} has only the trivial solution.)

  2. 2. (3 pts) Determine whether v1=[121]\mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 2 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}, v2=[243]\mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{bmatrix} 2 \\ 4 \\ 3 \end{bmatrix}, v3=[120]\mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 2 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix} are linearly independent. If they are dependent, give an explicit dependence relation.

    Solution

    2. Solve c1v1+c2v2+c3v3=0c_1\mathbf{v}_1 + c_2\mathbf{v}_2 + c_3\mathbf{v}_3 = \mathbf{0} by reducing [v1  v2  v3][\mathbf{v}_1\;\mathbf{v}_2\;\mathbf{v}_3]:

    [121242130]→R3−R1R2−2R1[12100001−1].\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & 1 \\ 2 & 4 & 2 \\ 1 & 3 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \xrightarrow[R_3 - R_1]{R_2 - 2R_1} \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & -1 \end{bmatrix}.

    Only two pivots (columns 1 and 2), so c3c_3 is free — a nontrivial solution exists, and the set is linearly dependent. Taking c3=1c_3 = 1: from c2−c3=0c_2 - c_3 = 0, c2=1c_2 = 1; from c1+2c2+c3=0c_1 + 2c_2 + c_3 = 0, c1=−3c_1 = -3. Dependence relation:

    −3v1+v2+v3=0,i.e.v2+v3=3v1.-3\mathbf{v}_1 + \mathbf{v}_2 + \mathbf{v}_3 = \mathbf{0}, \quad\text{i.e.}\quad \mathbf{v}_2 + \mathbf{v}_3 = 3\mathbf{v}_1.

  3. 3. (3 pts) Determine whether v1=[101]\mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}, v2=[210]\mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{bmatrix} 2 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}, v3=[013]\mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ 1 \\ 3 \end{bmatrix} are linearly independent.

    Solution

    3. Reduce [v1  v2  v3][\mathbf{v}_1\;\mathbf{v}_2\;\mathbf{v}_3]:

    [120011103]→R3−R1[1200110−23]→R3+2R2[120011005].\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 & 3 \end{bmatrix} \xrightarrow{R_3 - R_1} \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \\ 0 & -2 & 3 \end{bmatrix} \xrightarrow{R_3 + 2R_2} \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 5 \end{bmatrix}.

    There is a pivot in every column, so c1=c2=c3=0c_1 = c_2 = c_3 = 0 is the only solution. The vectors are linearly independent.

  4. 4. (3 pts) Find all values of hh for which the vectors [1−12]\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \\ 2 \end{bmatrix}, [301]\begin{bmatrix} 3 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}, [h2−3]\begin{bmatrix} h \\ 2 \\ -3 \end{bmatrix} are linearly dependent.

    Solution

    4. Row reduce [v1  v2  v3][\mathbf{v}_1\;\mathbf{v}_2\;\mathbf{v}_3], keeping hh symbolic:

    [13h−10221−3]→R3−2R1R2+R1[13h03h+20−5−3−2h]→R3 → 3R3+5R2[13h03h+2001−h].\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 3 & h \\ -1 & 0 & 2 \\ 2 & 1 & -3 \end{bmatrix} \xrightarrow[R_3 - 2R_1]{R_2 + R_1} \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 3 & h \\ 0 & 3 & h+2 \\ 0 & -5 & -3-2h \end{bmatrix} \xrightarrow{R_3 \,\to\, 3R_3 + 5R_2} \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 3 & h \\ 0 & 3 & h+2 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 - h \end{bmatrix}.

    The set is linearly dependent exactly when column 3 has no pivot, i.e. when 1−h=01 - h = 0. So the vectors are linearly dependent iff h=1h = 1 (and independent for every other value of hh).

  5. 5. (3 pts) State whether each of the following is true or false, and justify each answer.

    (a) A set of two vectors is linearly dependent if and only if one is a scalar multiple of the other.

    (b) Any set of four vectors in R3\mathbb{R}^3 is linearly dependent.

    (c) If {v1,v2,v3}\{\mathbf{v}_1, \mathbf{v}_2, \mathbf{v}_3\} is linearly dependent, then each of the three vectors is a linear combination of the other two.

    Solution

    5.

    (a) True. If v2=kv1\mathbf{v}_2 = k\mathbf{v}_1 then kv1−v2=0k\mathbf{v}_1 - \mathbf{v}_2 = \mathbf{0} is a nontrivial relation; conversely a nontrivial relation c1v1+c2v2=0c_1\mathbf{v}_1 + c_2\mathbf{v}_2 = \mathbf{0} with, say, c2≠0c_2 \neq 0 gives v2=−c1c2v1\mathbf{v}_2 = -\tfrac{c_1}{c_2}\mathbf{v}_1. (The zero-vector edge cases are included: 0=0⋅v\mathbf{0} = 0\cdot\mathbf{v}.)

    (b) True. Four vectors in R3\mathbb{R}^3 are more vectors than entries; by Theorem 8 any such set is linearly dependent.

    (c) False. Dependence only guarantees some vector is a combination of the rest. Counterexample: v1=(1,0)\mathbf{v}_1 = (1,0), v2=(0,1)\mathbf{v}_2 = (0,1), v3=0\mathbf{v}_3 = \mathbf{0}. The set is dependent, but v1\mathbf{v}_1 is not a combination of v2\mathbf{v}_2 and v3\mathbf{v}_3.

  6. 6. (3 pts) Without any calculation, decide whether each set is linearly independent or dependent, and name the theorem or fact that justifies your answer.

    (a) {[1234],[5678],[0000]}\left\{\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 2 \\ 3 \\ 4 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 5 \\ 6 \\ 7 \\ 8 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}\right\}

    (b) A set of five vectors in R4\mathbb{R}^4.

    (c) {[100],[010]}\left\{\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}\right\}

    Solution

    6.

    (a) Dependent. The set contains the zero vector; a set containing 0\mathbf{0} is always linearly dependent (take coefficient 11 on 0\mathbf{0} and 00 elsewhere).

    (b) Dependent. Five vectors in R4\mathbb{R}^4 is more vectors than entries; by Theorem 8 the set is dependent.

    (c) Independent. Two vectors, neither a scalar multiple of the other (they point along different axes), so by the two-vector criterion the set is independent.

  7. 7. (3 pts) Prove that {v1,v2,v3}\{\mathbf{v}_1, \mathbf{v}_2, \mathbf{v}_3\} is linearly dependent if and only if at least one of the vectors is a linear combination of the other two.

    Solution

    7. (⇐\Leftarrow) Suppose one vector, say v3=av1+bv2\mathbf{v}_3 = a\mathbf{v}_1 + b\mathbf{v}_2. Then av1+bv2−v3=0a\mathbf{v}_1 + b\mathbf{v}_2 - \mathbf{v}_3 = \mathbf{0} is a linear dependence with a nonzero coefficient (−1-1 on v3\mathbf{v}_3), so the set is dependent.

    (⇒\Rightarrow) Suppose the set is dependent: there are scalars c1,c2,c3c_1, c_2, c_3, not all zero, with c1v1+c2v2+c3v3=0c_1\mathbf{v}_1 + c_2\mathbf{v}_2 + c_3\mathbf{v}_3 = \mathbf{0}. Pick an index kk with ck≠0c_k \neq 0; then vk=−1ck∑j≠kcjvj\mathbf{v}_k = -\tfrac{1}{c_k}\sum_{j \neq k} c_j\mathbf{v}_j, expressing vk\mathbf{v}_k as a linear combination of the other two. ■\blacksquare

  8. 8. (4 pts ••) Suppose {v1,v2,v3}\{\mathbf{v}_1, \mathbf{v}_2, \mathbf{v}_3\} is linearly independent. Prove that {v1+v2,  v2+v3,  v1+v3}\{\mathbf{v}_1 + \mathbf{v}_2, \; \mathbf{v}_2 + \mathbf{v}_3, \; \mathbf{v}_1 + \mathbf{v}_3\} is also linearly independent.

    Solution

    8. Suppose a(v1+v2)+b(v2+v3)+c(v1+v3)=0a(\mathbf{v}_1 + \mathbf{v}_2) + b(\mathbf{v}_2 + \mathbf{v}_3) + c(\mathbf{v}_1 + \mathbf{v}_3) = \mathbf{0}. Grouping by vi\mathbf{v}_i:

    (a+c)v1+(a+b)v2+(b+c)v3=0.(a + c)\mathbf{v}_1 + (a + b)\mathbf{v}_2 + (b + c)\mathbf{v}_3 = \mathbf{0}.

    Since {v1,v2,v3}\{\mathbf{v}_1, \mathbf{v}_2, \mathbf{v}_3\} is linearly independent, all coefficients vanish:

    a+c=0,a+b=0,b+c=0.a + c = 0, \quad a + b = 0, \quad b + c = 0.

    Subtracting the second from the first gives c−b=0c - b = 0, so b=cb = c; the third then gives 2b=02b = 0, so b=c=0b = c = 0, and a+c=0a + c = 0 gives a=0a = 0. The only solution is a=b=c=0a = b = c = 0, so the set {v1+v2,v2+v3,v1+v3}\{\mathbf{v}_1 + \mathbf{v}_2, \mathbf{v}_2 + \mathbf{v}_3, \mathbf{v}_1 + \mathbf{v}_3\} is linearly independent. ■\blacksquare