The Timpson Lyceum · Real Analysis (2020)
Lecture 22 Part 2 (Real Analysis 2020)
Overview
This final part of the course collects the corollaries that follow from the Second Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC). Having established that differentiating an integral with a variable upper limit returns the integrand, we extend this in several directions: integrating toward a lower variable limit, adopting conventions for reversed and degenerate bounds, splitting an integral additively across an arbitrary triple of points, freeing the base point from the endpoint of the interval, and finally combining FTC with the chain rule to differentiate integrals whose upper limit is itself a function. Together these results turn the FTC into a flexible toolkit for differentiating integral-defined functions.
Key Concepts
Second FTC (starting point). For continuous on and , The derivative "cancels" the integral, returning the integrand evaluated at the upper limit.
Corollary — variable lower limit. If instead the variable sits at the lower bound, the sign flips: This is proved by splitting . The left side is a constant in , so differentiating gives , hence the derivative equals .
Definition — reversed and equal bounds. For an integrable and points , define
- Reversed orientation: — integrating "backwards" negates the value.
- Degenerate interval: — the "area" over a single point is zero.
These are conventions (definitions), not theorems, but they make the next result hold for points in any order.
Additivity over three points. For an integrable and any three points (in any order), The point need not lie between and . There are only six orderings of three points; each reduces to the standard split once the reversed-bound convention is applied to put the limits in increasing order.
Corollary — FTC with an arbitrary base point. Let be continuous on an open interval and let be any point of it. Then for all , Unlike the original statement, the base point is any interior point, not a fixed endpoint . The proof writes (legitimate even if , since the value of a definite integral does not depend on whether an endpoint lies in the open interval). Differentiating, the first term is constant (derivative ) and the second gives .
Corollary — chain-rule (Leibniz) form. Let be continuous on and let be differentiable with image contained in , so the composition is defined. Fix . Then This is the chain rule applied to the integral-defined function. Define , so the quantity above is . By the chain rule , and by the FTC , giving .
Worked Example
Differentiate an integral whose upper limit is a function — the Leibniz form combining the FTC with the chain rule.
Concretely, for we take and :
Summary
- Differentiating returns ; with the variable on the lower limit, .
- By definition, reversing the bounds negates an integral, , and integrating from a point to itself gives .
- Additivity holds for any three points in any order, justified by the reversed-bound convention.
- The base point in the FTC can be any interior point : , since shifting the base only adds a constant.
- The Leibniz/chain-rule form handles a variable upper limit by composing with .
- These corollaries make the FTC a practical tool for differentiating any function defined as an integral with variable limits.