The Timpson Lyceum seal

The Timpson Lyceum · Real Analysis (2020)

Lecture 17 (Real Analysis 2020)

Overview

This lecture begins the theory of integration by building the Darboux (Riemann) integral from the ground up. Just as the derivative captures the slope of a function, the integral captures the area under a curve on a closed interval. The strategy is to approximate that area with rectangles, sandwich the true area between an under-estimate and an over-estimate, and then squeeze the two together. To make this precise we define partitions, lower and upper Darboux sums, refinements, and finally the lower and upper integrals — culminating in the definition of what it means for a function to be integrable.

Key Concepts

Partition. A partition PP of a closed interval [a,b][a,b] is a finite set of points P={x0,x1,…,xn},a=x0<x1<⋯<xn=b.P = \{x_0, x_1, \dots, x_n\}, \qquad a = x_0 < x_1 < \cdots < x_n = b. Each xix_i is a partition point, and each [xi−1,xi][x_{i-1}, x_i] (for 1≤i≤n1 \le i \le n) is a partition interval. Dividing [a,b][a,b] into nn subintervals requires n+1n+1 points — always one more point than there are intervals.

Infimum and supremum on a subinterval. For a bounded function ff on [a,b][a,b] and each partition interval, define

By definition mi≤Mim_i \le M_i on every interval. These need not occur at the endpoints — they can be attained anywhere inside the subinterval.

Lower and upper Darboux sums. Stacking rectangles whose heights are the min (resp. max) on each subinterval: L(f,P)=∑i=1nmi (xi−xi−1),U(f,P)=∑i=1nMi (xi−xi−1).L(f, P) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} m_i\,(x_i - x_{i-1}), \qquad U(f, P) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} M_i\,(x_i - x_{i-1}). The lower sum uses rectangles that "barely reach" the curve; the upper sum uses rectangles that "barely clear" it. Since mi≤Mim_i \le M_i, we always have L(f,P)≤U(f,P)L(f,P) \le U(f,P), with equality precisely for a constant function. Intuitively the true area lies between them.

Telescoping of widths. For any partition, the subinterval widths add up to the whole interval: ∑i=1n(xi−xi−1)=b−a.\sum_{i=1}^{n} (x_i - x_{i-1}) = b - a.

Coarse bounds (a lemma). If m≤f(x)≤Mm \le f(x) \le M for all x∈[a,b]x \in [a,b] (global bounds, no subscript), then for every partition PP: m(b−a)≤L(f,P)≤U(f,P)≤M(b−a).m(b-a) \le L(f,P) \le U(f,P) \le M(b-a). Every lower sum is at least the single under-estimating rectangle, and every upper sum is at most the single over-estimating rectangle.

Refinement. A partition P∗P^* is a refinement of PP if P⊆P∗P \subseteq P^* — it keeps all of PP's points and adds more. Refining can only sharpen the estimates: L(f,P)≤L(f,P∗),U(f,P∗)≤U(f,P).L(f,P) \le L(f,P^*), \qquad U(f,P^*) \le U(f,P). Adding points pushes the lower sum up toward the true area and the upper sum down toward it.

Any lower sum ≤ any upper sum. For any two partitions P1,P2P_1, P_2 (related or not), L(f,P1)≤U(f,P2).L(f, P_1) \le U(f, P_2). Proof idea: let P∗=P1∪P2P^* = P_1 \cup P_2, a common refinement of both. Then L(f,P1)≤L(f,P∗)≤U(f,P∗)≤U(f,P2)L(f,P_1) \le L(f,P^*) \le U(f,P^*) \le U(f,P_2).

Lower and upper integrals. Take the best possible estimates over all partitions: ∫ab‾f=sup⁡PL(f,P),∫ab‾f=inf⁡PU(f,P).\underline{\int_a^b} f = \sup_P L(f,P), \qquad \overline{\int_a^b} f = \inf_P U(f,P). The lower integral is the supremum (least upper bound) of all lower sums; the upper integral is the infimum (greatest lower bound) of all upper sums. Because every lower sum is below every upper sum, it always follows that ∫ab‾f  ≤  ∫ab‾f.\underline{\int_a^b} f \;\le\; \overline{\int_a^b} f.

Integrability. A bounded ff is integrable on [a,b][a,b] exactly when these two numbers agree, and then the integral is their common value: ∫abf=∫ab‾f=∫ab‾f.\int_a^b f = \underline{\int_a^b} f = \overline{\int_a^b} f. A constant function f(x)=cf(x) = c is integrable with ∫abc=c(b−a)\int_a^b c = c(b-a). The Dirichlet function on [0,1][0,1] — f(x)=0f(x) = 0 for rational xx, f(x)=1f(x) = 1 for irrational xx — is not integrable: since rationals and irrationals are both dense, every subinterval has mi=0m_i = 0 and Mi=1M_i = 1, so ∫01‾f=0\underline{\int_0^1} f = 0 while ∫01‾f=1\overline{\int_0^1} f = 1.

Worked Example

Compute ∫02x dx\displaystyle \int_0^2 x\,dx from the definition by splitting [0,2][0,2] into nn equal pieces and taking the upper sum, then letting n→∞n \to \infty. Each subinterval has width 2n\frac{2}{n}, the right endpoint of the ii-th rectangle is i⋅2ni \cdot \frac{2}{n}, and its height is f ⁣(i⋅2n)=2inf\!\left(i\cdot\tfrac{2}{n}\right) = \tfrac{2i}{n}. Using ∑i=1ni=n(n+1)2\sum_{i=1}^{n} i = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}:

∫02x dx=lim⁡n→∞  ∑i=1nf ⁣(2in)⋅2n=lim⁡n→∞  2n∑i=1n2in=lim⁡n→∞  4n2∑i=1ni=lim⁡n→∞  4n2⋅n(n+1)2=lim⁡n→∞  4n2+4n2n2=lim⁡n→∞(2+2n)=2.\begin{aligned} \int_0^2 x\,dx &= \lim_{n\to\infty}\; \sum_{i=1}^{n} f\!\left(\tfrac{2i}{n}\right)\cdot \tfrac{2}{n} = \lim_{n\to\infty}\; \frac{2}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{2i}{n} \\ &= \lim_{n\to\infty}\; \frac{4}{n^2}\sum_{i=1}^{n} i = \lim_{n\to\infty}\; \frac{4}{n^2}\cdot \frac{n(n+1)}{2} \\ &= \lim_{n\to\infty}\; \frac{4n^2 + 4n}{2n^2} = \lim_{n\to\infty}\left( 2 + \frac{2}{n} \right) = 2. \end{aligned}

This matches the geometric area of the triangle under y=xy = x from 00 to 22: 12(base)(height)=12(2)(2)=2\tfrac{1}{2}(\text{base})(\text{height}) = \tfrac{1}{2}(2)(2) = 2.

Summary