The Timpson Lyceum · Real Analysis (2020)
Lecture 16 (Real Analysis 2020)
Overview
This lecture covers three related ideas. First is the Cauchy Mean Value Theorem, a generalization of the ordinary Mean Value Theorem to a pair of functions, proved using the same Rolle's-theorem trick. Second is a Cauchy-type remainder theorem (Theorem 4.24): by applying the Cauchy MVT repeatedly to a function whose first several derivatives vanish at a point, we extract a single point at which an th derivative captures the function's value — the machinery behind Taylor-series approximation. Finally, the lecture introduces Leibniz notation , reinterpreting the derivative as a limit of and showing why treating and like a ratio makes inverse-function derivatives and implicit differentiation easy.
Key Concepts
Cauchy Mean Value Theorem (Thm 4.23). Let be continuous on and differentiable on , with for all . Then there exists such that
- Interpretation. The left side is the ratio of the two slopes at a single point; the right side is the ratio of the two functions' average slopes over (the common cancels).
- The ordinary MVT is a special case. Taking gives , , which collapses the statement to .
Rolle's Theorem (the engine of the proof). If is continuous on , differentiable on , and , then for some .
Auxiliary function technique. To prove the Cauchy MVT, define One checks , applies Rolle's theorem to get , and since , solving gives (legal because ).
A function that "kills" its low-order derivatives. For , repeated differentiation gives for , while . (Example: .) This is the model behavior assumed in the next theorem.
Cauchy remainder theorem (Thm 4.24). Let be an open interval, , and have derivatives, with for all at some . Then for each in there is a point between and such that
- Why it matters. This is the seed of the Taylor series: it lets messy functions (e.g. ) be approximated by polynomials, which is how such functions are evaluated in practice.
- Proof idea. Set and apply the Cauchy MVT repeatedly. Each application bumps the order of differentiation by one while the quotient stays equal to (because both functions and their low-order derivatives vanish at ). After steps you reach , and .
Leibniz notation. Starting from the difference quotient with and , This is the same derivative as , with now playing the role the base point played before. The symbol ("derivative of with respect to ") is not literally a fraction, but in many situations it can be manipulated as if and were separate quantities.
Inverse-function derivative. Since undoes , Reading as " as a function of " makes the reciprocal relationship transparent.
Implicit differentiation. When is defined implicitly by an equation in and , differentiate both sides with respect to , treating as a function of (so every -term carries a chain-rule factor , while ), then solve algebraically for .
Worked Example
Implicit differentiation of a circle. Differentiate with respect to and solve for the slope .
Check. At the top of the circle the formula gives , matching the horizontal tangent there. The expression is undefined where (the points ), exactly where the circle has a vertical tangent — consistent with the curve splitting into the two branches on .
Summary
- The Cauchy Mean Value Theorem equates the ratio of two functions' slopes at one interior point to the ratio of their average slopes; the ordinary MVT is the case .
- It is proved exactly like the MVT: build , show , and apply Rolle's theorem.
- A function of the form has all derivatives up to order vanishing at , with the th derivative equal to .
- Theorem 4.24 applies the Cauchy MVT repeatedly to such functions, yielding — the foundation of Taylor-polynomial approximation.
- Leibniz notation rewrites the derivative as ; though not a true fraction, it can often be manipulated like one.
- This ratio view makes the inverse-function rule and implicit differentiation (differentiate, attach to each -term, solve) immediate.