The Timpson Lyceum · Real Analysis (2020)
Lecture 14 (Real Analysis 2020)
Overview
This lecture introduces two major differentiation rules: the derivative of an inverse function and the chain rule (the derivative of a composition of two functions). Both are proven rigorously from the limit definition of the derivative, with the inverse-function rule resting on the fact that a strictly monotone continuous function has a continuous inverse. The conceptual heart of the lecture is staying disciplined about which variable belongs to which function — confusing where you evaluate is the single most common mistake. The payoff is the general power rule: combining the inverse rule (for ) with the chain rule (for compositions) extends from integer exponents to all rational exponents.
Key Concepts
Geometric intuition for the inverse derivative. A derivative is the slope of a function at a point. The inverse function swaps the roles of and (reflecting the graph, or equivalently swapping the axes). At the same geometric point, the slope becomes — the reciprocal. So if , then .
The biggest gotcha — where you evaluate. The inverse derivative is taken at , not at :
It is wrong to write . Plugging into gives ; to recover you must plug into . Keeping one variable tied to each function (write and , never re-using for both) prevents the confusion.
Inverse Function Theorem (derivative form). Let be an open interval containing and let be strictly monotone and continuous. Suppose exists and . Then is differentiable at and
- Strict monotonicity guarantees is continuous (a result proven earlier), which lets the limit pass from to .
- The requirement is essential: if the original slope is , the reciprocal (the inverse's slope) is undefined.
- Corollary (interval form). If is differentiable, strictly monotone, and everywhere, then is differentiable on the whole image, and — the same statement with the variables relabeled.
Chain rule. For the composition , the derivative is the derivative of the outside (evaluated at the inside) times the derivative of the inside:
The name "chain" reflects that a longer tower of nested functions produces a product chain of derivatives.
Auxiliary-function technicality in the chain-rule proof. Writing with risks dividing by zero, because without strict monotonicity can equal at points other than . Define
which "fills the hole" at without changing any limit (the limit at a removable hole is unaffected by the value there). Then holds in both cases, and the proof goes through without ever dividing by zero.
General power rule (rational exponents). For on with :
Built in stages: integer exponents (earlier), then via the inverse rule (it is the inverse of ), then any by writing and applying the chain rule. Writing with keeps the root's domain non-negative.
Worked Example
Verify the inverse-derivative rule for on at , so . Here , giving , so we expect . The inverse is ; compute its derivative at directly from the definition, rationalizing the difference quotient:
This matches . Note the evaluation point is , not — evaluating the inverse derivative at would be the classic error.
Summary
- The inverse derivative is the reciprocal of the original derivative, evaluated at the matching point: with .
- Always evaluate the inverse derivative at , not — keep each variable bound to one function to avoid the most common slip.
- The Inverse Function Theorem requires strictly monotone and continuous with ; monotonicity gives a continuous inverse, and a nonzero slope keeps the reciprocal defined.
- The chain rule states — derivative of the outside (at the inside) times derivative of the inside.
- The chain-rule proof uses an auxiliary function to fill the removable hole at , avoiding division by zero when is not monotone.
- Combining the inverse rule (for ) with the chain rule (for ) extends the power rule to all rational exponents: .