The Timpson Lyceum seal

The Timpson Lyceum · Real Analysis (2020)

Lecture 10 (Real Analysis 2020)

Overview

This lecture proves two of the central theorems about continuous functions on closed intervals: the Extreme Value Theorem and the Intermediate Value Theorem. Both match the intuition that a continuous function drawn without lifting your pen must "fill in" all its intermediate values and reach its highest and lowest points — but that intuition is not the definition, so each statement requires proof from the sequential definition of continuity. Along the way we establish a boundedness lemma, recall the Sequential Compactness Theorem, and prove the Nested Interval Theorem (the tool needed for the IVT proof). We close with the corollary that a continuous function maps intervals to intervals.

Throughout, continuity means: if xn→xx_n \to x in the domain, then f(xn)→f(x)f(x_n) \to f(x). Every "obvious" picture-fact below is earned from that single definition.

Key Concepts

Setup and notation. For f:D→Rf : D \to \mathbb{R}, the set DD is the domain and the image is f(D)={ y:∃ x∈D, f(x)=y }.f(D) = \{\, y : \exists\, x \in D,\ f(x) = y \,\}. A function attains a maximum (minimum) if its image f(D)f(D) has a largest (smallest) element. The point x1x_1 where f(x1)f(x_1) is the max is the maximizer; similarly the minimizer.

Why a closed interval matters. On open intervals extrema can fail to exist:

Boundedness Lemma. If f:[a,b]→Rf : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R} is continuous, then ff is bounded. (Proof by contradiction; uses Sequential Compactness — see Worked Example.)

Extreme Value Theorem. If f:[a,b]→Rf : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R} is continuous, then ff attains a maximum and a minimum value on [a,b][a,b].

Sequential Compactness Theorem (recalled). A sequence inside a closed interval [a,b][a,b] is bounded, hence (by Bolzano–Weierstrass) has a convergent subsequence, and its limit again lies in [a,b][a,b].

Nested intervals. A sequence of closed intervals In=[an,bn]I_n = [a_n, b_n] is nested if In+1⊆InI_{n+1} \subseteq I_n for all nn, equivalently an≤an+1≤bn+1≤bn.a_n \le a_{n+1} \le b_{n+1} \le b_n.

Nested Interval Theorem. If {In}\{I_n\} are nested and lim⁡n→∞(bn−an)=0\lim_{n\to\infty}(b_n - a_n) = 0, then there exists exactly one point xx with x∈Inx \in I_n for all nn, and lim⁡n→∞an=lim⁡n→∞bn=x.\lim_{n\to\infty} a_n = \lim_{n\to\infty} b_n = x.

Intermediate Value Theorem. If f:[a,b]→Rf : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R} is continuous and CC is any value between f(a)f(a) and f(b)f(b), then there exists x0∈(a,b)x_0 \in (a,b) with f(x0)=Cf(x_0) = C.

Applications of the IVT.

Convex sets and the image of an interval. A set D⊆RD \subseteq \mathbb{R} is convex if for any two points in DD all points between them are also in DD; on R\mathbb{R} this is exactly "being an interval." Corollary of the IVT: if II is an interval and f:I→Rf : I \to \mathbb{R} is continuous, then f(I)f(I) is an interval — continuous images of intervals are intervals.

Worked Example

Boundedness Lemma — ff continuous on [a,b][a,b] is bounded.

Suppose, for contradiction, ff is not bounded above. Then for every n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N} there is a point xn∈[a,b]x_n \in [a,b] whose value exceeds nn. This defines a sequence whose images are forced upward; a convergent subsequence then forces its image to be bounded — a contradiction.

For all n:f(xn)>n,xn∈[a,b]Seq. compactness: ∃ xnk→x∈[a,b]Indices satisfy nk≥k  ⇒  f(xnk)>nk≥k  →  ∞But continuity: f(xnk)→f(x)  ⇒  (f(xnk)) is bounded⇒ contradiction.\begin{aligned} &\text{For all } n:\quad f(x_n) > n, \qquad x_n \in [a,b] \\ &\text{Seq. compactness: } \exists\, x_{n_k} \to x \in [a,b] \\ &\text{Indices satisfy } n_k \ge k \;\Rightarrow\; f(x_{n_k}) > n_k \ge k \;\to\; \infty \\ &\text{But continuity: } f(x_{n_k}) \to f(x) \;\Rightarrow\; \big(f(x_{n_k})\big) \text{ is bounded} \\ &\Rightarrow\ \text{contradiction.} \end{aligned}

A symmetric argument rules out unboundedness below, so ff is bounded.

IVT application — every C>0C > 0 has a positive square root.

Define a continuous function on a closed interval whose values bracket CC, then invoke the IVT.

f:[0, C+1]→R,f(x)=x2f(0)=0<Cf(C+1)=C2+2C+1>C⇒ ∃ x0∈(0, C+1)  with  f(x0)=x02=C.\begin{aligned} f : [0,\, C+1] \to \mathbb{R}, \quad &f(x) = x^2 \\ f(0) = 0 &< C \\ f(C+1) = C^2 + 2C + 1 &> C \\ \Rightarrow\ \exists\, x_0 \in (0,\, C+1) \ \text{ with } \ &f(x_0) = x_0^2 = C. \end{aligned}

So x0=Cx_0 = \sqrt{C} exists and is positive.

Summary