The Timpson Lyceum · Real Analysis (2020)
Lecture 10 (Real Analysis 2020)
Overview
This lecture proves two of the central theorems about continuous functions on closed intervals: the Extreme Value Theorem and the Intermediate Value Theorem. Both match the intuition that a continuous function drawn without lifting your pen must "fill in" all its intermediate values and reach its highest and lowest points — but that intuition is not the definition, so each statement requires proof from the sequential definition of continuity. Along the way we establish a boundedness lemma, recall the Sequential Compactness Theorem, and prove the Nested Interval Theorem (the tool needed for the IVT proof). We close with the corollary that a continuous function maps intervals to intervals.
Throughout, continuity means: if in the domain, then . Every "obvious" picture-fact below is earned from that single definition.
Key Concepts
Setup and notation. For , the set is the domain and the image is A function attains a maximum (minimum) if its image has a largest (smallest) element. The point where is the max is the maximizer; similarly the minimizer.
Why a closed interval matters. On open intervals extrema can fail to exist:
- on has image — no max, no min (no smallest positive number).
- on has image — unbounded above (since ), so no max.
Boundedness Lemma. If is continuous, then is bounded. (Proof by contradiction; uses Sequential Compactness — see Worked Example.)
Extreme Value Theorem. If is continuous, then attains a maximum and a minimum value on .
- Proof idea (max case): By the lemma is bounded above, so by completeness it has a supremum . Build with , so . A convergent subsequence gives, by continuity, . Since the supremum is attained, it is the maximum.
Sequential Compactness Theorem (recalled). A sequence inside a closed interval is bounded, hence (by Bolzano–Weierstrass) has a convergent subsequence, and its limit again lies in .
Nested intervals. A sequence of closed intervals is nested if for all , equivalently
Nested Interval Theorem. If are nested and , then there exists exactly one point with for all , and
- Proof idea: is increasing and bounded above (every is an upper bound), so it converges to its supremum . Since , too. As is the sup of and inf of , it is the unique number sandwiched in every interval.
Intermediate Value Theorem. If is continuous and is any value between and , then there exists with .
- Proof idea (bisection, assuming ): Start with . At each step take the midpoint ; keep the half whose endpoint values still straddle — if set , else . This keeps and halves the length, so . By the Nested Interval Theorem there is a unique with . Continuity gives and ; since , both limits equal , so .
Applications of the IVT.
- Square roots exist: every has a positive square root.
- Roots of high-degree polynomials: there is no quadratic-formula analogue for degree , but the IVT still certifies that a solution exists. E.g. has a root in since .
Convex sets and the image of an interval. A set is convex if for any two points in all points between them are also in ; on this is exactly "being an interval." Corollary of the IVT: if is an interval and is continuous, then is an interval — continuous images of intervals are intervals.
Worked Example
Boundedness Lemma — continuous on is bounded.
Suppose, for contradiction, is not bounded above. Then for every there is a point whose value exceeds . This defines a sequence whose images are forced upward; a convergent subsequence then forces its image to be bounded — a contradiction.
A symmetric argument rules out unboundedness below, so is bounded.
IVT application — every has a positive square root.
Define a continuous function on a closed interval whose values bracket , then invoke the IVT.
So exists and is positive.
Summary
- On a closed interval, a continuous function is bounded and attains its maximum and minimum (Extreme Value Theorem); on open intervals these can fail.
- The proofs run through sequences: build a sequence whose images approach the target value, extract a convergent subsequence via Sequential Compactness, then apply the sequential definition of continuity.
- The Nested Interval Theorem — nested closed intervals with lengths shrinking to pin down exactly one common point — is the engine behind the IVT.
- The Intermediate Value Theorem says a continuous function on hits every value between and ; it is proved by repeated bisection to construct the right nested intervals.
- The IVT proves existence of square roots and of roots of polynomials (e.g. degree-5 equations) even when no solving formula exists.
- As a corollary, continuous functions map intervals to intervals; on , convex sets are exactly intervals.