The Timpson Lyceum seal

The Timpson Lyceum · Real Analysis (2020)

Lecture 5 (Real Analysis 2020)

Overview

This lecture opens Chapter 2 with the central object of real analysis: the limit of a sequence. It builds up four foundational definitions — sequence, series, convergence, and limit — and then turns to the proofs that make limits usable. The heart of the material is the ε-N\varepsilon\text{-}N definition of convergence and the technique for proving a given sequence converges to a given value. From there it establishes that limits are unique (so "the limit" is well defined), shows how to prove a sequence diverges, and develops the algebraic limit laws (the comparison lemma, sum law, product laws, scalar law) that let you compute new limits from known ones. The lecture closes by previewing how plugging a convergent sequence into a polynomial converges to the polynomial of the limit — the seed of continuity and the limit of a function.

Key Concepts

Sequence. A sequence is a real-valued function whose domain is the natural numbers, f:N→Rf : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{R}. We write the nnth term as ana_n rather than f(n)f(n). Only the output values and their order matter; despite the brace-like notation a sequence is not a set, because order matters and terms may repeat. Examples: an=n2a_n = n^2 gives 1,4,9,16,…1,4,9,16,\dots; an=1na_n = \tfrac1n gives 1,12,13,…1,\tfrac12,\tfrac13,\dots; an=n+1na_n = \tfrac{n+1}{n} gives 2,32,43,…2,\tfrac32,\tfrac43,\dots.

Series (infinite series). Given a sequence ana_n, define a new sequence cnc_n by summing the first nn terms: cn=∑k=1nak.c_n = \sum_{k=1}^{n} a_k. Then cnc_n is an infinite series, and its nnth term cnc_n is the nnth partial sum. For example, from an=12na_n = \tfrac{1}{2^n} the series is 12, 34, 78, 1516,…\tfrac12,\ \tfrac34,\ \tfrac78,\ \tfrac{15}{16},\dots Like any sequence it has infinitely many terms; in this course only infinite series are considered.

Convergence (ε-N\varepsilon\text{-}N definition). A sequence ana_n converges to aa if for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there exists a natural number NN such that ∣an−a∣<εfor all n≥N.|a_n - a| < \varepsilon \quad \text{for all } n \ge N. Intuition: no matter how tiny a tolerance ε\varepsilon you choose around aa, there is some point NN in the sequence beyond which every term lies within the band (a−ε, a+ε)(a-\varepsilon,\, a+\varepsilon). Smaller ε\varepsilon just forces a larger NN. The inequality is equivalent to a−ε<an<a+εa - \varepsilon < a_n < a + \varepsilon.

Limit. Once convergence is shown to produce one and only one value, that value is named the limit: if ana_n converges to aa we write lim⁡an=a\lim a_n = a. Naming it as a single number (like defining the additive inverse only after proving it unique) lets us treat lim⁡\lim as a well-defined unary operation taking a sequence to a real number.

Key tool — the Archimedean property. For every positive real number there is a natural number NN with 1N\tfrac1N smaller than it. This is what converts an arbitrary ε\varepsilon into the index NN needed in convergence proofs.

Proof strategy for lim⁡an=a\lim a_n = a. Do scratch work first: simplify ∣an−a∣|a_n - a| and bound it above by something simple (e.g. Cn\tfrac{C}{n}), enlarging the expression as needed (making a denominator smaller, or multiplying a term by nn, only increases it). Then use the Archimedean property to choose NN so the simple bound is <ε< \varepsilon, and write the clean chain of inequalities.

Uniqueness of limits. A convergent sequence has exactly one limit. Proof idea (by contradiction): if an→aa_n \to a and an→a′a_n \to a' with a′>aa' > a, choose ε<a′−a2\varepsilon < \tfrac{a'-a}{2} (less than half the gap). The two bands (a−ε,a+ε)(a-\varepsilon,a+\varepsilon) and (a′−ε,a′+ε)(a'-\varepsilon,a'+\varepsilon) are disjoint, yet beyond N=max⁡(N1,N2)N = \max(N_1,N_2) the terms must lie in both — forcing an<ana_n < a_n, a contradiction.

Divergence. To show a sequence does not converge, negate the definition: exhibit one ε>0\varepsilon > 0 such that no number aa and no index NN make ∣an−a∣<ε|a_n - a| < \varepsilon hold from NN onward. For an=(−1)na_n = (-1)^n (which alternates −1,1,−1,1,…-1, 1, -1, 1, \dots) take ε=12\varepsilon = \tfrac12. Any interval of length 11 (here 2ε=12\varepsilon = 1) contains at most one integer, but from any index onward the sequence visits both −1-1 and 11, which cannot both lie in such an interval.

Comparison lemma. If lim⁡an=a\lim a_n = a and there exist N1∈NN_1 \in \mathbb{N} and a constant C≥0C \ge 0 with ∣bn−b∣≤C ∣an−a∣for all n≥N1,|b_n - b| \le C\,|a_n - a| \quad \text{for all } n \ge N_1, then lim⁡bn=b\lim b_n = b. This proves new convergences without returning to the definition: a quantity squeezed (within a constant factor) by something tending to 00 also tends to 00.

Algebraic limit laws. For convergent sequences an→aa_n \to a, bn→bb_n \to b:

Limits of polynomials (preview). For a polynomial p(x)=∑k=0mckxkp(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{m} c_k x^k, if an→aa_n \to a then p(an)→p(a)p(a_n) \to p(a). Feeding a convergent sequence through pp produces a sequence converging to pp evaluated at the limit — the foundation for the limit of a function and continuity.

Worked Example

Prove that nn+1→1\dfrac{n}{n+1} \to 1.

Scratch work bounds the error and the Archimedean property supplies NN with 1N<ε\tfrac1N < \varepsilon:

∣nn+1−1∣=∣n−(n+1)n+1∣=1n+1≤1n≤1N<εfor all n≥N.\begin{aligned} \left|\frac{n}{n+1} - 1\right| &= \left|\frac{n - (n+1)}{n+1}\right| = \frac{1}{n+1} \\ &\le \frac{1}{n} \le \frac{1}{N} < \varepsilon \qquad \text{for all } n \ge N. \end{aligned}

Since ∣nn+1−1∣<ε\left|\frac{n}{n+1} - 1\right| < \varepsilon for all n≥Nn \ge N, by definition nn+1→1\dfrac{n}{n+1} \to 1.

Product law via null sequences (proof sketch). To show anbn→aba_n b_n \to ab, use lim⁡an=a  ⟺  lim⁡(an−a)=0\lim a_n = a \iff \lim(a_n - a)=0, so it suffices to show lim⁡(anbn−ab)=0\lim(a_n b_n - ab) = 0. Set the null sequences αn=an−a\alpha_n = a_n - a and βn=bn−b\beta_n = b_n - b (so αn→0\alpha_n \to 0, βn→0\beta_n \to 0). Substituting an=αn+aa_n = \alpha_n + a, bn=βn+bb_n = \beta_n + b:

lim⁡(anbn−ab)=lim⁡((αn+a)(βn+b)−ab)=lim⁡(αnβn+a βn+b αn)=lim⁡(αnβn)⏟0+alim⁡βn⏟0+blim⁡αn⏟0=0,\begin{aligned} \lim(a_n b_n - ab) &= \lim\big((\alpha_n + a)(\beta_n + b) - ab\big) \\ &= \lim\big(\alpha_n\beta_n + a\,\beta_n + b\,\alpha_n\big) \\ &= \underbrace{\lim(\alpha_n\beta_n)}_{0} + a\underbrace{\lim \beta_n}_{0} + b\underbrace{\lim \alpha_n}_{0} = 0, \end{aligned}

using the null-product law, the sum law, and the scalar law. Hence lim⁡(anbn)=ab\lim(a_n b_n) = ab.

Summary