The Timpson Lyceum seal

The Timpson Lyceum · Real Analysis (2020)

Lecture 3 (Real Analysis 2020)

Overview

This lecture has two halves. The first reviews several proof-by-induction exercises on the natural numbers and integers: closed-form sums (∑i2\sum i^2, ∑i3\sum i^3) and the closure of N\mathbb{N} and Z\mathbb{Z} under addition and subtraction. The recurring lesson is to phrase each claim as an "if–then" statement, define an inductive set AA, and exploit the fact that N\mathbb{N} is a subset of every inductive set. The second half opens Section 1.2 and builds toward two headline results: every half-open unit interval (c,c+1](c, c+1] contains exactly one integer, and the rationals (and irrationals) are dense in R\mathbb{R}. The key tool unlocking all of this is the Archimedean property, proved from the completeness axiom.

Key Concepts

Inductive sets and the induction template. A set is inductive if it contains 11 and is closed under +1+1 (i.e. k∈A⇒k+1∈Ak \in A \Rightarrow k+1 \in A). N\mathbb{N} is a subset of every inductive set. To prove a statement holds for all naturals, let AA be the set of naturals making it true, show AA is inductive, and conclude A=NA = \mathbb{N}.

Standard closed-form sums (by induction):

Closure of N\mathbb{N} and Z\mathbb{Z}. Proved by induction, each reusing the previous one:

Starting induction "above 1." To prove a claim only from n=2n = 2 (or 55, etc.) onward, define AA to also contain the small excluded values outright. Then proving A=NA = \mathbb{N} still works, and the genuinely-true cases are exactly the ones you care about.

Completeness axiom. Every nonempty set of reals bounded above has a least upper bound (supremum). Unlike a maximum, the supremum need not lie in the set — e.g. sup⁡(0,1)=1∉(0,1)\sup(0,1) = 1 \notin (0,1), and (0,1)(0,1) has no maximum.

Archimedean property. For every real cc there exists n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N} with n>cn > c; equivalently, N\mathbb{N} is not bounded above. Proved by contradiction: if some cc bounded N\mathbb{N}, then b=sup⁡Nb = \sup\mathbb{N} exists, b−12b - \tfrac{1}{2} is not an upper bound, so some n>b−12n > b - \tfrac{1}{2}, whence n+1>b+12>bn+1 > b + \tfrac{1}{2} > b — a natural exceeding the supremum.

Integers and intervals.

Density. A set is dense in R\mathbb{R} if every open interval (a,b)(a,b) contains a point of it.

Worked Example

Claim. Q\mathbb{Q} is dense in R\mathbb{R}: every open interval (a,b)(a,b) contains a rational.

Idea: pick a step 1n\tfrac{1}{n} smaller than the gap b−ab-a, scale up by nn so the window (bn−1, bn](bn-1,\,bn] is guaranteed to capture an integer mm, then scale back down so mn\tfrac{m}{n} lands in (a,b)(a,b).

Choose n∈N with 1n<b−a(Archimedean corollary), so a<b−1n<b.Scale by n:bn−1<bn, and by the (c,c+1] theorem some integer m satisfies bn−1≤m<bn.Divide by n:b−1n  ≤  mn  <  b.Since a<b−1n:a  <  mn  <  b.\begin{aligned} &\text{Choose } n \in \mathbb{N} \text{ with } \tfrac{1}{n} < b - a \quad(\text{Archimedean corollary}), \text{ so } a < b - \tfrac{1}{n} < b. \\ &\text{Scale by } n:\quad bn - 1 < bn, \text{ and by the } (c, c+1] \text{ theorem some integer } m \text{ satisfies } bn - 1 \le m < bn. \\ &\text{Divide by } n:\quad b - \tfrac{1}{n} \;\le\; \tfrac{m}{n} \;<\; b. \\ &\text{Since } a < b - \tfrac{1}{n}: \qquad a \;<\; \tfrac{m}{n} \;<\; b. \end{aligned}

Thus the rational mn∈(a,b)\tfrac{m}{n} \in (a,b). For the irrationals, apply this to the interval (a2,b2)\left(\tfrac{a}{\sqrt{2}}, \tfrac{b}{\sqrt{2}}\right) to get a rational qq there; then q2∈(a,b)q\sqrt{2} \in (a,b) and is irrational.

Summary