The Timpson Lyceum · Real Analysis (2020)
Lecture 3 (Real Analysis 2020)
Overview
This lecture has two halves. The first reviews several proof-by-induction exercises on the natural numbers and integers: closed-form sums (, ) and the closure of and under addition and subtraction. The recurring lesson is to phrase each claim as an "if–then" statement, define an inductive set , and exploit the fact that is a subset of every inductive set. The second half opens Section 1.2 and builds toward two headline results: every half-open unit interval contains exactly one integer, and the rationals (and irrationals) are dense in . The key tool unlocking all of this is the Archimedean property, proved from the completeness axiom.
Key Concepts
Inductive sets and the induction template. A set is inductive if it contains and is closed under (i.e. ). is a subset of every inductive set. To prove a statement holds for all naturals, let be the set of naturals making it true, show is inductive, and conclude .
- Phrase every proof as "if then ." Naming the antecedent and consequent tells you exactly what to assume and what to induct on. You must induct on a quantity that has a smallest value () — inducting on "" fails because no sum of two naturals equals .
Standard closed-form sums (by induction):
- . Reuse the known value of rather than reproving it.
Closure of and . Proved by induction, each reusing the previous one:
- Sum: if then (induct on , using " is inductive" for the step).
- Predecessor: if and , then . Start the induction effectively at by putting into "for free": let .
- Difference: if and then .
- The integer versions ( closed under and ) follow by splitting into sign cases (zero, both positive, mixed signs, both negative) and applying the natural-number results, since .
Starting induction "above 1." To prove a claim only from (or , etc.) onward, define to also contain the small excluded values outright. Then proving still works, and the genuinely-true cases are exactly the ones you care about.
Completeness axiom. Every nonempty set of reals bounded above has a least upper bound (supremum). Unlike a maximum, the supremum need not lie in the set — e.g. , and has no maximum.
Archimedean property. For every real there exists with ; equivalently, is not bounded above. Proved by contradiction: if some bounded , then exists, is not an upper bound, so some , whence — a natural exceeding the supremum.
- Corollary. For every there is with . (Apply the property to .) This is the workhorse for limit proofs.
Integers and intervals.
- No integer lies strictly between consecutive integers: contains no integer. (Reduce to "no integer lies in ," since the smallest positive integer is .)
- A nonempty set of integers bounded above contains a maximum (its supremum lands inside it).
- Exactly one integer in : for every real there is one and only one integer in .
Density. A set is dense in if every open interval contains a point of it.
- is dense in .
- The irrationals are dense in , using that a (nonzero) rational times an irrational is irrational.
Worked Example
Claim. is dense in : every open interval contains a rational.
Idea: pick a step smaller than the gap , scale up by so the window is guaranteed to capture an integer , then scale back down so lands in .
Thus the rational . For the irrationals, apply this to the interval to get a rational there; then and is irrational.
Summary
- Frame inductive proofs as "if then ," define naturals making it true, show is inductive, and conclude ; induct on something with a least value.
- Key sums: and ; reuse earlier results instead of reproving.
- and are closed under addition and (legal) subtraction, each proved by induction reusing the prior closure fact.
- The completeness axiom (every set bounded above has a supremum) gives the Archimedean property: is unbounded, so for any some .
- Every half-open unit interval contains exactly one integer; a bounded set of integers has a maximum.
- and the irrationals are both dense in — every open interval, no matter how small, contains each.