The Timpson Lyceum · Real Analysis (2020)
Lecture 2 (Real Analysis 2020) part 3
Overview
This part builds the natural numbers up from the notion of an inductive set, then uses that foundation to justify the Principle of Mathematical Induction as a theorem rather than an article of faith. With induction in hand we climb the number systems — integers, rationals — and discover that even though the rationals satisfy every field and positivity axiom, they are not enough: there is no rational number whose square is . Proving is irrational motivates the final ingredient of the real numbers, the Completeness Axiom, expressed through least upper bounds (suprema). The part closes by defining the square-root symbol via a uniqueness result and showing that completeness for upper bounds automatically delivers greatest lower bounds (infima).
Key Concepts
Inductive set. A set is inductive if and whenever then .
The natural numbers. is defined as the intersection of all inductive sets. Consequently:
- is a subset of every inductive set.
- is itself inductive: lies in every inductive set so ; and if then lies in every inductive set, so does too, hence .
- If is an inductive subset of , then (since from inductiveness and by assumption). This double-containment fact is the engine behind every proof by induction.
Principle of Mathematical Induction. Let be a statement about each natural number . If
- (base case) is true, and
- (inductive step) for every ,
then is true for all . The proof: form . The base case gives ; the inductive step gives . So is an inductive subset of , hence . Induction only reaches the naturals (starting at and stepping by never lands on , say), which is exactly why the conclusion is restricted to .
The number systems.
- (integers) = the naturals, their negatives, and .
- (rationals) .
- fails the field axioms (no additive inverses, no ); fails them (no multiplicative inverses); is the first system satisfying all field and positivity axioms — yet still not the reals.
Divisibility, even, odd. For integers : means there exists with . An integer is even if it equals for some (equivalently ); odd if it equals for some . Basic results proved by these definitions: a product of two evens is even; a product of two odds is odd; and (by induction) every integer is even or odd.
Why the rationals are not enough. The polynomial is negative at and positive at , so it "should" cross zero — but no rational number does so. Hence analysis needs more than the field/positivity axioms.
Bounded sets and the Completeness Axiom. A nonempty set is bounded above if there is with for all (such a is an upper bound). The Completeness Axiom: every nonempty set that is bounded above has a least upper bound. This least upper bound is the supremum . Symmetrically, a set is bounded below if some for all , and its greatest lower bound is the infimum . For example is bounded above with supremum — completeness is what conjures irrational numbers into existence.
Uniqueness of positive square roots. For each there is exactly one with ; this unique positive solution defines . Existence comes from completeness; uniqueness is proved below.
Infima come for free. Completeness is stated only for upper bounds, but reflecting a set through converts a lower bound into an upper bound, so every nonempty set bounded below has an infimum — no second axiom required.
Worked Example
Claim. for every (proof by induction).
Let . Showing is inductive forces .
So . Thus is inductive, , and the formula holds for all .
A second, contradiction-style proof: . Suppose for contradiction that with , , where (reducing the fraction) at least one of is odd.
Now and are both even, contradicting that at least one was odd. Hence no such fraction exists and .
Summary
- is the intersection of all inductive sets; it is itself inductive, and its only inductive subset is — the key fact behind induction.
- The Principle of Mathematical Induction is a theorem: take , show it is inductive, conclude . Induction reaches exactly the naturals.
- Climbing , the rationals are the first system satisfying all field and positivity axioms, yet has no rational solution.
- Using divisibility and the even/odd dichotomy (every integer is even or odd), a contradiction argument shows is irrational.
- The Completeness Axiom — every nonempty set bounded above has a least upper bound (supremum) — supplies the missing real numbers; the supremum of is .
- Each has a unique positive square root (defining ), and reflecting through shows every set bounded below has an infimum, so no separate axiom for lower bounds is needed.