The Timpson Lyceum seal

The Timpson Lyceum · General Topology (Point Set Topology)

Connectedness, Homeomorphisms, & IVT – Lecture 19 (Topology)

Overview

This lecture deepens the study of connectedness, then uses it to reach two headline results. Starting from the definition of a connected space, we build the is-connected relation, show it is an equivalence relation, and use its equivalence classes to define the components of a space. We prove that components really are connected sets and that homeomorphisms carry components to components (and cut sets to cut sets). The centerpiece is a fully rigorous proof that R\mathbb{R} with the standard topology is connected, leaning on the completeness axiom. We close with a tour of connected spaces built by quotient/gluing constructions (circle, torus, Möbius band, Klein bottle, sphere), the notions of cut set and cut point, and a first look at the Intermediate Value Theorem in its topological form.

Key Concepts

Disconnected vs. connected. A space XX is disconnected iff there exist open sets U,VU, V with U∪V=X,U∩V=∅,U≠∅,V≠∅.U \cup V = X, \quad U \cap V = \varnothing, \quad U \neq \varnothing, \quad V \neq \varnothing. Such a pair (U,V)(U,V) is a separation of XX. XX is connected iff it is not disconnected. Unlike open/closed (a set may be both, one, or neither), every space is exactly one of connected or disconnected.

Union theorem. If AA and BB are connected and A∩B≠∅A \cap B \neq \varnothing, then A∪BA \cup B is connected. This is the engine behind most proofs below.

The is-connected relation. Define a relation ∼\sim on XX by x∼y  ⟺  ∃ C⊆X connected with x,y∈C.x \sim y \iff \exists\, C \subseteq X \text{ connected with } x, y \in C.

Hence ∼\sim is an equivalence relation.

Components. The equivalence classes of ∼\sim are the components of XX. Intuitively, a component is the largest connected set containing a given point — you cannot enlarge it and stay connected. Two points lie in the same component iff some connected set contains both.

Totally disconnected. XX is totally disconnected iff every component is a single-element (singleton) set. Example: R\mathbb{R} with the lower limit topology Rℓ\mathbb{R}_\ell (basis [a,b)[a,b)). Any subset with at least two points u<vu < v splits as (−∞,w)∩S(-\infty, w) \cap S and [w,∞)∩S[w, \infty) \cap S via a half-open cut at some ww with u<w≤vu < w \le v; so every point is its own component. The standard topology Rstd\mathbb{R}_{\text{std}} (basis open intervals) is, by contrast, connected.

Homeomorphism. f:X→Yf: X \to Y is a homeomorphism iff it is a continuous bijection whose inverse is also continuous. It pairs off both the points and the open sets of XX and YY. Recall: continuous maps preserve connectedness in both directions — a connected set's image is connected, and a connected set's preimage is connected.

Cut set / cut point. Let XX be connected. A subset S⊆XS \subseteq X is a cut set iff X∖SX \setminus S is disconnected. A single point pp is a cut point iff {p}\{p\} is a cut set.

Connectedness is built up by gluing. Since quotient (gluing) maps and products of connected sets preserve connectedness, the following are all connected: the closed interval [0,1][0,1], the circle S1S^1, the unit square I×II \times I, the annulus, the Möbius band, the torus S1×S1S^1 \times S^1, the Klein bottle, the sphere S2S^2, the projective plane, and the punctured plane.

Intermediate Value Theorem (topological form). If f:X→Rf: X \to \mathbb{R} is continuous, XX is connected, and cc lies between two attained values f(a)f(a) and f(b)f(b), then there exists x0∈Xx_0 \in X with f(x0)=cf(x_0) = c. The classical calculus IVT is the special case X=[a,b]X = [a,b]; the sign-change corollary (a continuous ff with f(a),f(b)f(a), f(b) of opposite signs has a zero) follows immediately. A consequence (Borsuk–Ulam style): for continuous f:S2→Rf: S^2 \to \mathbb{R} there is a point CC with f(C)=f(−C)f(C) = f(-C) — e.g. two antipodal points of Earth always share the exact same temperature.

Worked Example

Claim: R\mathbb{R} with the standard topology is connected.

Proof (by contradiction). Suppose R\mathbb{R} is disconnected, so there is a separation (U,V)(U, V): open, disjoint, nonempty, with U∪V=RU \cup V = \mathbb{R}. Pick u∈Uu \in U, v∈Vv \in V, and WLOG u<vu < v. On the subspace [u,v][u,v] set U′=U∩[u,v]U' = U \cap [u,v] and V′=V∩[u,v]V' = V \cap [u,v]; these form a separation of [u,v][u,v]. By the completeness axiom, the set U′U' (bounded above by vv) has a least upper bound; let

c=sup⁡U′∈[u,v].\begin{aligned} c &= \sup U' \in [u,v]. \end{aligned}

We show cc lies in neither U′U' nor V′V' — a contradiction, since (U′,V′)(U',V') covers [u,v][u,v].

Case c∈V′c \in V'. Then cc sits in a basis interval (d,v](d, v] with d<cd < c, lying inside V′V'. Consider the midpoint d+c2\tfrac{d+c}{2}, which satisfies

d  <  d+c2  <  c.\begin{aligned} d \;<\; \tfrac{d+c}{2} \;<\; c. \end{aligned}

Then d+c2\tfrac{d+c}{2} is an upper bound of U′U' (it lies in the V′V'-interval, above which there are no U′U' points) yet is smaller than cc — contradicting c=sup⁡U′c = \sup U'.

Case c∈U′c \in U'. Since U′U' is open, some basis interval (a,b)∋c(a,b) \ni c lies inside U′U'. The midpoint c+b2\tfrac{c+b}{2} then satisfies

c  <  c+b2  <  b,\begin{aligned} c \;<\; \tfrac{c+b}{2} \;<\; b, \end{aligned}

so c+b2∈U′\tfrac{c+b}{2} \in U' is an element of U′U' larger than cc — contradicting that cc is an upper bound of U′U'.

Both cases are impossible, so cc belongs to no part of the separation. This contradiction shows no separation exists; therefore R\mathbb{R} is connected. ■\blacksquare

Summary